Discussion about this post

User's avatar
arjun's avatar

Counterpoint as I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this and decided to go against the “doomer” school of thought.

“If you decide to become a technology brother, make sure you like technology. Because it’s unlikely that the markets are gonna 10x again by the time we’re all ready to buy homes.”

We’re arguably in the middle of the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Like the ones before it, the engineers entering the field right now are exactly the people positioned to capture the most value from that shift. Telling someone to avoid tech for wealth reasons in 2026 feels a lot like telling someone that steam and coal power wouldn’t create value.

Rising home prices are a housing supply problem, not a tech problem, and tech is still probably your best shot at affording one. More importantly though, I think the framing of property as the wealth vehicle is worth questioning altogether. Your parents’ path was essentially: get in early on a transformative technology wave, let it compound over 30 years through a 401k. That mechanism isn’t dead. It just looks different now. Buying public equity in foundation model companies as they IPO might be the analog for our generation that your parents’ 401k was for theirs. They didn’t invent the internet, they just had the sense to be in the room. The question is whether we recognize that AI might be that same room; and if so, a career in tech is still probably the best seat in the house.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?